How To Tighten A Sew In

policy. return e


By now there is no longer even want to comment on the obscene, but alas usual monstrosities of our policy. The last order of time invested, again, the Prime Minister who, as a man "lover of life and women" and "generous to those most in need," was made innocently dragged into another story repeating the structure parties-women-sex-money .. we are just tired of commenting on the facts in themselves .. but the anger that flows from it and there is so much the desire and strength to fight back .. it will be, my, utopia young, naive .. but I do not want believe that our policy is just that .. because, I mean, being the chairman of the most prominent figure, he knows more about his private life, but underneath, the roots, there is a more corrupt than ever, terms of patronage often facilitated by "commercial", non-commercial, the woman .. there are examples of the cases, Berlusconi precisely Bertolaso, apples and so lengthening the list down to a fine (hopefully) .. but can a country to be governed in such a way? .. let's leave the demagoguery of "we are in a crisis, let's policy, but rather the Chairman of the Board what it does?" .. .. evitiamola extract the time from our dimension .. c 'is a time when there be allowed to govern well and one where you can afford otherwise? No.. It is unthinkable to a system based on these theories. The government, whatever that it (a country, a company ...) should aim solely and exclusively to the welfare of those that must be managed, but beware! .. Fanatical nationalism without falling into self-sufficient .. it's easy, and misleading to understand the social welfare as an social contract .. one has tried it, coming to a conclusion almost catastrophic, because man is subject to temptation and "power is the strongest aphrodisiac" .. we go back to a utopian dimension and trasportiamola in an eternal present: the virtue , ethics and accountability in politics, and therefore the government should be building blocks and timeless, detached from any partisan label .. sadly regrets to say that politics should be , when in reality you should be able to say is continuously is too long .. and he fails to say .. too much.