On September 27 members of the Criminal Chamber of Naples are called to elect the new Board of ' Association. He presented his candidacy only the Directors chaired by Adv. Lawyers and composed by Michael Cerabona Joseph Pellegrino, Domenico Ducci, Giuseppe Caruso, Annalisa Senese, Belloni Attilio, Guido Picciotto, Gary and Marco Balice Campora.In Court, however, already winding the first comments, the usual complaints: some complained of the "Bulgarian list" there are those who deny the substantial "monocraticità " that would generate any affection, chaired by Michele Cerabona; somebody brings back memories of the "manual Cencelli" there are those who promise to abstain from voting as a kind of protest (?).
Now these findings, which, incidentally, are the most repeated, should be analyzed carefully. Who complains
l '"imposition" of a single list and openly speaks of "the Bulgarian list" ignore that for granted the absence of taxation (no one has ever heard Michael Cerabona leading some to withdraw the application or take despotic attitudes), if there is "fault" in not having the opportunity to vote another list, this "fault" is certainly makes Member absent, those who did not want to apply to those who were unwilling to expose themselves.
Who is the characteristic of "monocraticità " the board found Cerabona clearly underestimates the value of the individual components of Directors that, just read the names, they promise, however, valuable personal contributions (as well as, can not hide, have provided substantial support for personal some elements of the old Directors: Maurizio Sica, Dina Cavalli, Guido and Massimo Vetrano Picciotto).
As for the "manual Cencelli", while not denying the configurability reading the list of names chosen by the President, I do not think this is operation which could create a scandal, if they are still talking about "political" associations.
few more words instead of spending it when it comes to abstain from voting.
Because, inevitably, such a choice involves a sense of membership in the Criminal Chamber. Any
joined the Association chose freely, at the time of fact, to participate in a forum of professionals who, far from being "union" corporatist, aims its act in the matter of legal policy, for example to safeguard the right of defense to secure the citizen (documents, speeches institutional, abstentions from the hearings, etc..), and, in terms of legal culture, for example to the disclosure of legislative and jurisprudential knowledge (conferences, courses update and more).
Being part of the Criminal Chamber means to make its contribution to all activities carried out by this, share, or even criticize the actions or positions taken in certain historical moments. Being part of the Criminal Chamber
means, and it seems self-evident remark, participate!
and participate and vote. Even the other hand, if you want. But you have to vote.
Because the only message that will be released by a low turnout is the de-legitimization of Directors and the President candidates. E 'de-legitimize the Criminal Chamber of the Association!
And the de-legitimization of the Criminal Chamber of the weakening takes dell'Avvocatura, already ill-treated, if not deliberately forgotten by the institutions. Rate
means "we." Vote "against" also means "we." Not voting is "not". It may not be the Criminal Chamber, one day, lead to not being lawyers.
Congratulations to the new directors ... anyway.
Now these findings, which, incidentally, are the most repeated, should be analyzed carefully. Who complains
l '"imposition" of a single list and openly speaks of "the Bulgarian list" ignore that for granted the absence of taxation (no one has ever heard Michael Cerabona leading some to withdraw the application or take despotic attitudes), if there is "fault" in not having the opportunity to vote another list, this "fault" is certainly makes Member absent, those who did not want to apply to those who were unwilling to expose themselves.
Who is the characteristic of "monocraticità " the board found Cerabona clearly underestimates the value of the individual components of Directors that, just read the names, they promise, however, valuable personal contributions (as well as, can not hide, have provided substantial support for personal some elements of the old Directors: Maurizio Sica, Dina Cavalli, Guido and Massimo Vetrano Picciotto).
As for the "manual Cencelli", while not denying the configurability reading the list of names chosen by the President, I do not think this is operation which could create a scandal, if they are still talking about "political" associations.
few more words instead of spending it when it comes to abstain from voting.
Because, inevitably, such a choice involves a sense of membership in the Criminal Chamber. Any
joined the Association chose freely, at the time of fact, to participate in a forum of professionals who, far from being "union" corporatist, aims its act in the matter of legal policy, for example to safeguard the right of defense to secure the citizen (documents, speeches institutional, abstentions from the hearings, etc..), and, in terms of legal culture, for example to the disclosure of legislative and jurisprudential knowledge (conferences, courses update and more).
Being part of the Criminal Chamber means to make its contribution to all activities carried out by this, share, or even criticize the actions or positions taken in certain historical moments. Being part of the Criminal Chamber
means, and it seems self-evident remark, participate!
and participate and vote. Even the other hand, if you want. But you have to vote.
Because the only message that will be released by a low turnout is the de-legitimization of Directors and the President candidates. E 'de-legitimize the Criminal Chamber of the Association!
And the de-legitimization of the Criminal Chamber of the weakening takes dell'Avvocatura, already ill-treated, if not deliberately forgotten by the institutions. Rate
means "we." Vote "against" also means "we." Not voting is "not". It may not be the Criminal Chamber, one day, lead to not being lawyers.
Congratulations to the new directors ... anyway.
0 comments:
Post a Comment