Il Corriere della Sera Tuesday, April 17, 2007, in an article by Luigi Ferrarella tells of an initiative undertaken by the Council of the Bar of Milan and some local judicial offices, "Convention for the training and guidance of practicing lawyers," brought to the attention of the Ministry of Justice and the CSM. In essence, we learn from the Corriere della Sera, "the profession of lawyer ... you will learn (also) going to school for a year by magistrates. The second year, to be exact, the two of forensic practice that every aspiring lawyer today has to do with a law firm ... The relationship between mentor and trainee will be customized: each trainee lawyer will be assigned to a single judge. " Always adds to the Corriere della Sera that "no hides the news is so special that they can even be shocking ... and in fact, the project promoters have tried to take all the precautions ... experimentation, for example, will not start in the field of criminal law "(!? sic?).
Now, beyond the latter recorded (excluding the area of \u200b\u200bcriminal trial), which, frankly, is not understood, then even if it is expressly provided for the practitioner's inability to participate in "closed session", the prohibition for the future of audience in the same process and the obligation of professional secrecy, does not hide the fact that the project lives of noble ideals. Of course, serious questions arise already (and apart from anything else) about the 'custody' of the individual practitioner to the individual judge: you really imagine what those lawyers in Naples, Rome and other areas in which practitioners are lawyers, numerically, about fifty (exaggerated? ) times the number of magistrates on duty ...
But the reflection that we tend to do immediately is quite another. Why not propose a "Convention for the training and guidance of the auditors of justice" by which, with all the attention, guarantees and future incompatibilities that you want, you provide the opportunity for young judges to spend a period of their audience at a law firm playing the role of a practicing lawyer? Even assuming that some judicial hearing officer, before winning the contest, played forensic practice, probably a vulgar refresher of the role and function of the defense certainly can not hurt him, but ...
Now, beyond the latter recorded (excluding the area of \u200b\u200bcriminal trial), which, frankly, is not understood, then even if it is expressly provided for the practitioner's inability to participate in "closed session", the prohibition for the future of audience in the same process and the obligation of professional secrecy, does not hide the fact that the project lives of noble ideals. Of course, serious questions arise already (and apart from anything else) about the 'custody' of the individual practitioner to the individual judge: you really imagine what those lawyers in Naples, Rome and other areas in which practitioners are lawyers, numerically, about fifty (exaggerated? ) times the number of magistrates on duty ...
But the reflection that we tend to do immediately is quite another. Why not propose a "Convention for the training and guidance of the auditors of justice" by which, with all the attention, guarantees and future incompatibilities that you want, you provide the opportunity for young judges to spend a period of their audience at a law firm playing the role of a practicing lawyer? Even assuming that some judicial hearing officer, before winning the contest, played forensic practice, probably a vulgar refresher of the role and function of the defense certainly can not hurt him, but ...
No comments:
Post a Comment