The forum's website UCPI we discussed "death penalty" and "due process" and also the possibility of celebrating the so-called "trial of the enemy." I thought it was appropriate this brief reflection:
<>, would answer with another question: in a society where you have to include (before or after a historic turning point date) winners and losers, is it possible to speak not only of "due process" but an absolute "process"? The victory (or the same classification as winners and losers ") requires a" war "at least a pathological phase of a democracy, and there may be a process, a" fair trial "without democracy? Neither process is not what we celebrate today's winners or losers in respect of what we celebrate today the winners against losers. Was certainly not "process" (let alone, in fact, "due process") the farce of the Nuremberg and nor were the other farces which is full of history. These farces that are defined processes are useful only groped to give legitimacy to punishment that war, whether right or wrong (if anything can be defined as such a war) requires. It is no less a hypocrite who justifies certain atrocities with the clichés that everything is permissible in war? There can never be a "process" when players are called losers and parts and winners.>>
<
0 comments:
Post a Comment